Proprietary Eponyms Catalogue

I chose 12 Proprietary Eponyms out of all these suggestions that arrived from all over the world to my inbox: Kodak, Xerox, Bic, Aspirin, Q-Tip, Styrofoam, Windex, Ketchup, Post it, Nescafe, Nesquik, Spax, Google, Rolodex, Filofax, Tupperware, Walkman, Phillips Screw, Lego, Pampers, Black & Decker, Vespa, Fridge (Frigidaire), Keds, Band-Aids, Cellophane, BMX Granola, Zipper, Yo-Yo, Nicorette, Nutella, Tampaz, Sharpie, X-Acto, La-Z-Boy, Velcro, Play-Doh, Zambuk, Lip Ice, BluTack, Chapstick, Skype, FedEx, Kraft Dinner, Tippex, Disprin, Dettol, Chupa Chups, Hoover, Jeep, Rollerblade, Gillete, Kispo, Formica, Cool Whip, TiVo, Linoleum, Guiness, Coke, Plexiglas, ZipLock, Saran Wrap, iPod, Frisbee, UHU, Tixo, Obi, Goiserer, Tesa, Patez, Tempo, Philadelphia, Zippo, Stanley, Scottex, Frigo, Sopalin, Vaseline, Chiclet, Labello, Cimbalino, Zewa, Edding, Nivea, Speedo, Slinky, Gladwrap, Sunlight, Prestik, Kreepy Krauly, Radenska, Superga, Spa, Stanley Knife.

Here is the result.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/freduarte/sets/72157608708661776/

Thank you so much to everyone who sent their suggestions.



22 Comments

  1. […] Observer: Observed on 10 Nov 2008 A catalog of proprietary eponyms. […]

  2. Jeff wrote:

    I am afraid you aren’t using the word eponym correctly.

    In most of the cases you cite, these are merely brand names that have become synonymous with the product they are–very successful marketing, but not eponyms.

    Eponyms are people whose name are the source of words.
    Examples: Daguerreotype, Dolby noise reduction system, Geiger counter, Braille, Guillotine, Ferris wheel. . .

    Almost none of your examples meet this criterion–. You are really talking about Trademarked brand names.

  3. An eponym is a general term used to describe from what or whom something derived its name. Therefore, a proprietary eponym could be considered a brand name (trademark or service mark) which has fallen into general use.

    We’ve all seen it happen. The commonplace products and services of today become the household word of tomorrow. Well, some might say ’tis the price companies pay for a popular product.

  4. Jeff wrote:

    I agree we’ve all seen it happen. I agree that the process which you describe does indeed occur and is interesting to observe. But I am making point about the language used to describe it.

    An eponym is not, as you suggest, a general term. It is a very specific term. Just as “bird” is a general term. “Northern cardinal” is a specific term.

    I don’t want to get into the whole “language is always evolving”-thing, but if language is to continue to be useful, different words should mean different things. And what you describe is simply not an eponym.

    I am not pointing this out to be rude. I am just interested in words and the way we use language.

    To your subsequent point, I would think that, rather than being the price companies pay for a successful product, they would consider it the pinnacle achievement of product development and marketing to have a brand name synonymous with the product itself.

  5. Mind the Qualifier wrote:

    Jeff —
    Where do you see any reference simply to eponyms? Just curious, because I see one instance where eponym is modified by “proprietary.” Perhaps you missed that?

    To argue the difference between “general” and “specific” while simultaneously NOT noting the difference between words and language is both silly and pedestrian.

  6. Jeff wrote:

    I take from your tone and your calling my arguments “silly and pedestrian” that you are adopting a dug-in defensive position and you are sticking to it. Fine. Use whichever words you wish, to mean whatever you want. It’s your little corner of the Internets. In the postmodern information age, “rules” are for squares. I get it.

    Sorry, but I do not believe that adding “proprietary” in front of a word changes its meaning. (No, perhaps I didn’t miss that.) A “proprietary” Northern cardinal is still a bird, but it is NOT a bluejay, no matter how you spin it.

    My impossible-to-prove speculation is: It seems that you really like the word eponym and are determined to defend its use here, despite its rigid inability to mean what you want it to mean.

    Whatever. It obviously doesn’t matter to anybody else and I won’t bother you further. I didn’t expect anyone to throw me a parade for pointing out this mistake, but I didn’t expect to be mocked, either. Congratulations. You chased off the only person who bothered to post a comment.

  7. You can definitely see your enthusiasm within the paintings you write. The world hopes for even more passionate writers such as you who aren’t afraid to mention how they believe. All the time follow your heart.

  8. Frederico wrote:

    I think you are wrong. Your list is not made of eponym. It’s a list of metonymy. Many eponyms derive from deliberate choices to call a product, invention, or scientific discovery after the PERSON most closely associated with it, for example: macadam, guillotine, pasteurisation. See: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/metonymy

  9. Hi there! Someone in my Myspace group shared this website with us so I came to check it out.
    I’m definitely enjoying the information. I’m bookmarking and will
    be tweeting this to my followers! Exceptional blog and fantastic style and
    design.

  10. bomb it 7 wrote:

    Appreciating the commitment you put into your blog and detailed
    information you present. It’s great to come across
    a blog every once in a while that isn’t the same outdated rehashed information. Excellent read!

    I’ve saved your site and I’m adding your RSS feeds to my Google account.

    Have a look at my blog – bomb it 7

  11. bomb it 7 wrote:

    Thank you, I’ve recently been searching for information approximately this topic for a long time and yours
    is the best I have found out till now. However, what about the conclusion? Are
    you sure about the supply?

    My website :: bomb it 7

  12. bomb it 7 wrote:

    I have read so many articles on the topic of the blogger lovers however
    this post is genuinely a nice post, keep it up.

    Stop by my web blog bomb it 7

  13. bomb it 7 wrote:

    Wow, marvelous blog layout! How long have you been blogging for?
    you made blogging look easy. The overall look of your site is fantastic, let alone the
    content!

    my blog: bomb it 7

  14. Jacob Dutka wrote:

    Hey there! Do you know if they make any plugins to assist with SEO?
    I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but
    I’m not seeing very good success. If you know of
    any please share. Thank you!

  15. bomb it 7 wrote:

    Hey! Quick question that’s entirely off topic.
    Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly?

    My website looks weird when viewing from my iphone 4.
    I’m trying to find a template or plugin that might be able to resolve this issue.
    If you have any recommendations, please share. Thank you!

    Look at my web site :: bomb it 7

  16. Hmm is anyone else experiencing problems with the images on this blog loading?
    I’m trying to figure out if its a problem on my end or if it’s the
    blog. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

  17. whoah this weblog is fantastic i love reading your
    articles. Stay up the great work! You know, lots of persons are searching round for this information, you could help them greatly.

Leave a Reply